Abstract:
The present study focuses on some uses of the metarepresentation marker gu
in the Budu language. Metarepresentation markers were first called interpretive
markers by Blass (1989,1990), but have so far come to be marking mainly hearsay,
speech acts, propositional attitude and echoic use. But gH, unlike most
metarepresention markers which only mark the above, can also replace truth functional
logical connectors, such as 'and', 'or', 'if .. .then', and also the negative. Throughout
this paper I want to attempt to explain the pragmatic interpretations of some of its
commonest use based on Relevance theoretical principles. I want to show that gu can
function not only as a 'hearsay' marker, but also can replace logical connectors
depending on the function they have in the environment. I will show that although gu presents a range of functions it only has two main grammatical uses: a
complementiser and particle, Finally, provide a conclusion that will be based on the
plausible analysis.
I do hope that the present study will bring new insight in the current area of
interest in the study of 'hearsay' markers and interpretive use. The study will also be a
contribution in enhancing the understanding of the particle gu in Budu discourse for
the benefit of Bible Translation work.
