Alienable and Inalienable Possession in Dholuo

dc.contributor.authorLang, Emese
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-12T11:21:26Z
dc.date.available2014-05-12T11:21:26Z
dc.date.issued2014-05-12
dc.descriptionAfrica International University (AIU) Intellectual output.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn his book A Grammar of Kenya Luo (Dholuo) (1993) Tucker explores the different types of genitives he found in the language. He attempts to differentiate between alienable and inalienable genitive constructions, basing his argument on the different forms of genitive head noun in Luo. However, after thorough investigation, it can be said that Luo does not have the semantic distinction of alienable and inalienable genitives. It does have two different forms of genitive construction but these have no difference semantically. The difference between Tucker's findings and those in this document may be due to recent language change, but this would need further investigation.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/366
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectAlienableen_US
dc.subjectInalienableen_US
dc.subjectPossessionen_US
dc.subjectDholuoen_US
dc.titleAlienable and Inalienable Possession in Dholuoen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Emese Lang.pdf
Size:
18.4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: