Abstract:
This study seeks to examine the decision-making process among the Digo
Muslims of Likoni - Mombasa, as influenced by their social systems and kinship
patterns, which in turn may impact conflict resolution and Christian witness among
them. The research discusses the historical background of the Digo people, their
descriptions, the penetration of Islam into Digoland, the Islamization of the Digo
people and the Islamic teachings on the process of decision-making.
In order to accomplish this research, a qualitative research methodology was
applied. Data was collected through open-ended interviews, structured and
unstructured interviews, as well as modest participant observation. It was then
analyzed and interpreted using the taxonomic analysis as specified by Spradley (1980,
112).
In light of the command of our Lord Jesus Christ and also the current
resurgence of Islam, conflict resolution and evangelism among Muslims communities
cannot be an option for the church of Christ. With this realization in mind, the author
felt moved to examine the process of decision making among Muslims, as this is the
only way that missionaries can engage Muslims in making decisions for Christ. In this
regard, this study will be used to help missionaries to develop relevant strategies and
apply them in solving the conflicts that keep erupting among the Islamic
communities. Concurrently, these strategies will be applied for Christian witness.
It was discovered that the principle that no community of Muslims, large or
small, should be without ul al-amr (a decision-making body) plays a great role among
the Digos. According to Surah 42: 38, believers' affairs are run by consultation
amongst themselves. Since the choice of the decision-makers is the first and an
important step in the running of the affairs of a community, as will be suggested later
in this study, this choice is also subject to the principle of consultation and must
therefore be made by a process of election that involves the whole community. After
their election, the decision-makers still remain bound by the principle of consultation.
It was discovered that after the elders are elected they remain in power as long as they
live. Additionally, they cannot decide whatever they desire or whatever suits them,
but rather must reach their decisions after due consultation.
